24 February 2007

What do you do with a Drunken Sailor?

The post 'Minor Complaints' at 'Rickety Contrivances of Doing Good' has spurred me to write a response (which has unfortunately taken me 4 weeks to complete...).

I read Susan's post and instantly felt guilty for the griping I do on my blog. Then I realized instead of feeling guilty, I should use this excellent opportunity as a time for me to share what really happens when someone comes in with what I consider to be a 'minor' complaint.

I would like to remind my regular readers (all three of you... Hi Dad, Hi Tracy, Hi Robin) that my blog is only one aspect of my nursing persona - I use it as an opportunity to blow off steam in a creative way. The frustration I show here would never be displayed to the patient or family in front of me. My goal when I speak to a patient is to treat them as I would want my family member to be treated, or how I would like to be treated myself. I have had some excellent experiences as a patient and family member, and I've had some really not so nice ones. They have all shaped the nurse I am.

The most recent experience I had as a patient was when I had a herniated disc. Next to having labour this was the most pain I have ever had. Now, I am stubborn, and I will carry on through most illnesses (fever, cough, cold, pneumonia, gastro), but this was completely beyond what I could work through. I could not move, and I certainly couldn't care for patients. My family, co-workers, chiropractor and massage therapist understood, but my doctor minimized it completely

"I don't think it's a disc - your symptoms are not severe enough."
and then once it was diagnosed on CT as a disc,
"It's only a small protrusion - you'll be fine."
I found this infuriating! I am telling you how I feel and you are telling me that I am not feeling what I say I'm feeling. I'm telling you that this really hurts and you're telling me it isn't. I'm telling you that this is interfering with my daily living and you are poo-pooing me.

This very small event reminded and reinforced for me that every patient who presents to Emergency does so because they perceive they have an emergency. It is my job to determine if it actually is an emergency or not. That is why I have taken all those physical assessment courses and have had all those workshops on triage. I don't come by this naturally - this is a learned skill I have, this ability to determine who is really sick and who is sick but can wait.

For some, it is a lack of knowledge that makes their non-emergency bigger in their eyes.
"I knew when her fever hit 104 that I had to rush her here before she had brain damage!"
These are sometimes the easiest and the hardest patients/families to care for. Most will listen to your reassurance and explanation and relax a bit. Others just think you are brushing off their concern, and obviously don't know what you are talking about "because my mother's brother's wife's sister-in-law's aunt's baby had brain damage after a fever!" Is this the way that the information is delivered to them or is it their fear making them unable to hear the information? Maybe both. I have no doubt that my physician was not meaning to put me down or minimize my concern - she was trying to reassure me that I would be OK. Even when she was wrong (it was a disc) she was right - I have recovered.

For some the emergency is acknowledged at the beginning as a non-emergency
"I know this isn't really an emergency but I didn't know where else to go - I called my family doc on Friday and I have an appointment booked for next Thursday, but this is getting worse and I didn't know were else to go!"
These are the people I feel for. They know that they are not critically ill but they do have symptoms worthy of assessment by a physician. They have tried to go the appropriate route but have been turned away or put off and are left with us as a path of last resort. They know that they are looking at hours of waiting for something that is clearly non-urgent, but still requires a physician's care.

Then there are those in pain. Pain is a hard one because it is so individual. Your broken toe may be as painful to you as my herniated disc was to me. Who am I to judge your pain? Again, I try hard to treat your pain and to acknowledge that you have it (I freely give out tylenol, advil, and ice packs in triage) while still placing you appropriately in the triage system. No matter how annoying your lacerated finger is, it is not a life threatening injury, and those with potential heart problems, breathing issues, broken long or joint bones, blocked bowels, dehydration, seizures and intractable cancer pain and many other concerns must all go ahead of you.

I find myself very annoyed with the people who while expressing frustration with their wait say things like:
"It's good this isn't a real emergency - if it was I'd be dead now!!"
These are the people who have come in with an acknowledged less-urgent concern and who are frustrated with their four or six or eight hour wait. The snappy response would be
"No, if this was a real emergency you'd be being treated by now. The fact that you're still here bugging me is a clear indication that you aren't sick!!"
However I bite my tongue and nicely reassure them that the reason for their wait is that we treat people based on acuity, but that we are still taking their concern seriously. I remember clearly one father who, after watching a child have a full-blown grand-mal seizure in the waiting room, stated
"I wish my kid would do that so we can get seen!"
I was definitely not at my professional best that night because I laughed out loud and said
"No you don't, silly man! You're lucky your child is well enough to wait to be seen!"
Luckily he saw the humour too and laughed with me, responding
"You're right. It's just so hard to wait."
And it is. Waiting is absolutely painful! In North America we are a culture of people who are used to getting what we want and right away. We have internet access to any information we want. We have cell phones and email for communication. We have fast food 'Your way. Right away!' We do not know how to wait. We would never survive in a bread line in Russia - imagine waiting five hours to purchase a loaf of bread! So after living our lives with instant gratification we are asked to wait what seems like an interminable length of time for care, at a time when we are feeling our worst and most vulnerable. We are scared, nauseated, dizzy, in pain. Every second we wait makes our symptoms seem worse and makes our fear grow.

So what is my point? Only this - the less urgent concerns are still the bread and butter of Emergency Nursing. Without these patients 60% of us would not have jobs. I'm happy to care for you. Please just recognize that I am doing the best I can with the resources available to me.

And lets agree to be mutually respectful. Deal?



For a real-time example of how I really respond, you can read (or re-read if you were already there, as there is an addendum) my post 'What to do?'.

7 dust motes:

Susan Palwick said...

Great post! I'm happy I inspired it! (For whatever it's worth, I routinely tell patients who are kvetching about waiting, "That means you aren't the sickest person here. You never want to be the center of attention in an emergency room!"

I was interested that you included seizures in your "pretty serious" list. I always freak out when I see a patient having a seizure -- largely because I've seen family members have them and they're scary! -- but in the ED where I volunteer, I've repeatedly had staff reassure me, "Oh, it's just a grand mal; it's no big deal."

But I know people who've died of grand mals. (And I'm currently rereading THE SPIRIT CATCHES YOU AND YOU FALL DOWN, where grand mals are a very big deal.) So how does this work? Once the caregivers have determined that the seizing patient hasn't broken any bones or aspirated anything into the lungs, it's a minor situation?

Mama Mia said...

Ah, seizures. They are indeed terrifying to watch. Even if we are not concerned about the seizure itself we sure wouldn't leave someone out in the waiting room to seize for the entertainment of all.

Our concern is not with the seizure itself, but the history around it (ie do you have a seizure disorder, so this is normal for you or is it new, after a head injury, related to drug or alcohol use/withdrawal, or part of some other illness like meningitis) and the length of time it continues. More than 30 minutes is time to make it stop.

A first seizure is always a concern and worthy of being checked out.

Febrile seizures (those that are associated with a fever) are fine, as they are usually self limited and they do not cause any lasting issues for the child.

Our families of patient's with seizure disorders are told to call for EHS when the seizure has been constant for 10 minutes. That allows a 20-30 minute response time for EHS before we feel the patient needs treatment. Most seizures will stop long before EHS arrives.

And of course there are lots of other little variations on seizures that require different approaches.

phoenix said...

I have to say 2 things (well maybe 3) I am always in awe of your ability to communicate your situation in an interesting and for lack of a better word entertaining way. I look forward to reading your latest blog but it truely never occured to me that it was anything other then a venu to express yourself, espically frustration. I think you put an amazing amount of care and energy into caring for your paitents and ensuring that they are cared for in the best, most respectful way possible. Sorry but your disclaimer at the start got me going. I always hope that if I or any one I care about has to have medical attention they will be treated by someone like you.

Finally - just cause I don't comment, doesn't mean I don't read.

Love you
K

Anonymous said...

I'm with phoenix here, just because I don't comment doesn't mean I don't read. I always look forward to your latest blog. It is great to see things from the professional view and you do so in such a wonderful, entertaining way even though it is more just a way to relieve frustrations. Kudos to you!

Kim said...

Ah, a sister-in-triage!

I know of what you speak!

AtYourCervix said...

I appreciate your posting specifically about seizures in this post/comments. Even though I'm an RN (and a reader of your blog, though I don't comment that often on many blogs!), when my son had his new onset seizure last weekend, I was scared out of my mind. I appreciate the viewpoint in detail of the triage/ER RN, and how seizures are triaged in the ER.

I have the utmost respect for ER nurses, since you (they) need to know so many different things, and care for patients of all ages who walk through the door.

BellaLinda said...

The pain thing is the one that got me. I went in to the ER once upon a time (to a Navy hospital, & in that system there's no other way to get seen within a month of making the appointment, 9 times out of 10) with pelvic pain so bad I could barely walk--but I could walk, so I did. The nurse doing triage did NOT believe I was in as much pain as I was, because I wasn't crying or rolling around on the floor or something equally dramatic.

I know it is fiendishly difficult to gauge something like an individual's pain, but I think the failsafe should be to believe the patient.

(And no, I didn't want pain meds, I wanted to be checked to rule out an ectopic pregnancy.)